There are some
old songs from the time of the revolutionary war. The victorious colonists took “Yankee Doodle”
as their theme song, but when Cornwallis’ army was marched out of Yorktown in
defeat, the fifes played “The World Turn’d Upside Down.” This is how it goes:
If buttercups buzzed after the bee,
If boats were on land, churches on sea,
If ponies rode men and the grass ate the cows,
Then cats should be chased into holes by the mouse … (Luther
39-40)
You get the
idea. The underfunded, undertrained,
outnumbered Americans had managed (with a great deal of help from France) to
beat one of the best armies in the world.
It was devastating.
How many of
you are feeling the same way about the COVID-19 quarantine situation? Almost everything we were doing on purpose as
activity professionals has become taboo or turned “upside down.” Group socialization is good for the residents
– no, it is dangerous. Human touch is
good for them – no, it is dangerous.
Getting out of their room is good for them – no, it is dangerous. Singing together is good for them – no, it’s
dangerous. Visitors are good for them –
no, they’re dangerous. Assisting someone
so they can be successful with a craft is good – no, you’re standing too
close. Loners are more susceptible to
depression, etc. – no, they’re safer from the virus. It seemed as though I could feel the gears in
my brain screeching to a slow stop.
I could not
get a picture in my brain of what the future of activities would be like. What I could imagine looked pretty grim. We started trying different things on the
units, but it was not the same quality of life for my residents that I had been
striving for these past years. If we
couldn’t provide quality of life, then what was the purpose of providing
care? Visions of the “bubble boy” came
to mind. Would it be possible for my
residents to ever find happiness again, given the issues with the pandemic?
I obviously needed
some outside input. The Bible actually has
a lot to say about happiness. Useful stuff. Some 2,700 related passages (Alcorn 19) ! I also began cruising the online TED talks. Each TED talk is officially 18 minutes of
presentation by an expert on a topic that expert is passionate about. One of the first things I found was a 2004 talk
about happiness entitled, The Surprising
Science of Happiness, by Dan Gilbert.
He was describing the results of large-scale cognitive science
experiments on how the brain functions. 2004
was before COVID-19. It was even before
the economic crash of 2008. Would there
be anything useful in it?
Gilbert
states that the pre-frontal cortex of our brains has the ability to simulate
experiences for us before we have them.
We call that imagination. However
well that works, he says the problem is that we are not so good at predicting
how those simulations would affect us if they came true. That is called the “impact bias” (TED, 2004).
He offers the example of imagining
winning the lottery or else becoming a paraplegic and estimating which one
would make you happier. Well, duh, you
say. But the actual data from people who
have experienced one or the other shows that neither set of individuals is
particularly happier one year later.
Your prediction was, predictably, biased by lack of understanding of how
your brain works.
So, what
happened? How could these two radically
different scenarios result in a similar outcome? Gilbert again explains that our brains have
the tendency to change how we view our situation in a way that lets us feel
better about it. He says that we “synthesize”
happiness with what he calls our “psychological immune system” (TED, 2004). Whoa! Did he say something about an immune
system? Well, that certainly is timely. And immunity to permanent devastation related
to a bad situation sounds pretty useful.
How you look at something really does make a difference. Actually, Gilbert says that except in certain
types of cases, most outcomes even out after about 3 months! The average natural happiness from what looks
like a happy situation will tend to equal the average synthetic happiness from
what used to look like a bad situation.
As a matter
of fact, I think I have observed this very process at work in our building. Two and a half months ago, the residents were
not happy to be losing access to
family visits, communal dining and group activities. They became more upset as time went on. Then I began noticing that there was more
acceptance. A new normal was setting
in. In fact, staff seems to be having
more trouble adapting than the residents themselves. A co-worker wondered if I was struggling
because of the loss of control over my part of the activity program. Well, yes, but hadn’t the residents also lost
even more control over their own lives? Gilbert
might have an answer for this, too. He
describes other experiments that prove we synthesize happiness the best when we
have no choices (TED, 2004). Apparently,
choices produce second-guessing which tends to rob us of happiness. Staff is doing the second-guessing while the
residents are busy adapting.
So, yes, both
faith and science tell us that our residents can find happiness in a
quarantined world. Some of us would say it’s
a gift that God ‘hard-wired’ in.
©Donna Stuart, ADC May
31, 2020
Alcorn, Randy.
Happiness. Carol Stream, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2015.
Gilbert, Dan. (2004, February). The
Surprising Science of Happiness. [Video
File]. Retrieved from
https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_the_surprising_science_of_happiness
Luther,
Frank. Americans and Their Songs. New York: Harper & Brothers
Publishers, 1942.
No comments:
Post a Comment